The primary subject of politics is the human person

Because politics, in the vision of the Church, deals with the good of people, individually and collectively, the primary subject of the political system is the human person. As a result, there are matters and issues that arise which the Church considers fundamentally
related to the dignity of the human person.

These matters are life, the family, education, religious belief, justice and protection for those most in need in society. The Church’s approach to such issues is based above all in the very nature of the human person as created in the image and likeness of God.
Consequently, you can certainly understand why the Church takes such an interest in these questions. It does so, not in an attempt to impose its views or doctrines on society, and even less on any legislative body, but rather it does so in a spirit of service to the common good and the nature of the human person, realities which transcend institutions, but which must rely on the good intentions of institutions to be protected and safeguarded. In that context it is even foreseen that at times the Church can offer its own expertise on these universal questions in collaboration with public authorities while always respecting the distinct competencies that each has.

Obviously, I am very much aware of the challenges facing you as lawmakers, in a pluralistic society, which has so many voices and different points of view about a whole range of issues. Yet, a convergence can be found in keeping in mind those principles whose goal you have as legislators in a spirit of service to your country: to promote the common good and to respect the nature and dignity of the human person.

Address of Apostolic Nuncio His Excellency Archbishop Faustino Sainz Muñoz to the Scottish Parliament

That is how to do it. Always praise politicians for being public servants, talk up this vocation and thank them for taking on such an onerous responsibility.

Church on pavement

Chris made me blog this too:

A number of Catholic lay people have joined with some local religious communities to plan a welcome that evening. The event will combine prayer, evangelization and singing, which organizers hope Pope Benedict will hear.

The Franciscan Friars of the Renewal, the Knights of Columbus, the Sisters of Life, Communion and Liberation, the Blessed Sacrament Fathers, the Daughters of St. Paul and other Catholic groups are organizing what they are calling a â??massive street evangelization eventâ?? at three locations in Manhattan. Their idea is to stand outside churches and invite people on the street to â??encounter the Lord in Eucharistic Adoration and Mass.â??

After Mass, those at each church will process to the 72nd Street residence of Archbishop Celestino Migliore, the Vaticanâ??s permanent observer to the United Nations, where Pope Benedict will be staying, and join together for a candlelight vigil and singing.

Evangelization is scheduled for two and a half hours, culminating with Eucharistic adoration at 7:00. Priests will be available for confessions. Mass begins at 8:30.

Notice the prevalence of relatively new orders and movements. Notice that the focus is on sharing the love of Christ and worshipping the Lord, rather than making sure the Pope is aware of and appreciates our diversity, very unique speciallness, and Extremely Urgent Needs and Concerns.

See, I told you. The future is processions. This is from Amy Welborn. She’s a darling.

Facing the hard questions helps

In addition to reshaping the dialogue between Catholicism and Islam, Benedict XVI has made significant changes in the Vatican’s intellectual approach to these volatile issues. Catholic veterans of the interreligious dialogue who did not press issues like religious freedom and reciprocity between the faiths have been replaced by scholars who believe that facing the hard questions helps support those Muslim reformers who are trying to find an authentic Islamic path to civility, tolerance and pluralism. Thus Benedict XVI has quietly put his pontificate behind the forces of Islamic reform–and may have found a crucial ally with a Saudi king who is wrestling with Wahhabi extremism in his own domain.

The pope is thinking in centuries here: a reformed Islam capable of living with religious and political pluralism could be an ally in the struggle against what Benedict once called the “dictatorship of relativism.” In any event, an Islam recognizing religious freedom and affirming the separation of religious and political authority would be good for Muslims who want to live in peace with their neighbors, and good for the rest of the world.

George Weigel How Benedict XVI Will Make History

Benedict in the US

The premier example of this was his Regensburg lecture of September 2006 in Germany, widely criticized at the time as offensive to Islamic sensibilities. That lecture, in fact, has shifted both the course of inter-religious dialogue and the internal dynamics of the intra-Islamic debate, precisely as I believe Benedict XVI intended it to do. It has shifted the course of the dialogue by setting in motion a process that has now led to the formation of a Catholic-Muslim forum that will meet twice a year, once in Amman, Jordan, once in Rome, and that will focus its attention on the issues that Benedict XVI has put on the agenda – namely, religious freedom as the first of human rights and a right that can be known by reason, and secondly, the imperative of separating spiritual and political authority in a justly governed state.

There have been attempts from parts of the Islamic world to deflect the conversation off of these two issues, which Benedict regards as at the very heart of inter-religious dialogue, and indeed the Islamic encounter with the modern world, and he refuses to budge. He very calmly and quietly brings the conversation back to these two points, which obviously have a great resonance here in the United States.

In terms of shifting the dialogue, I would also point to the recent initiative by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, who proposes to gather in his country a new forum of dialogue among the monotheistic religions, and the Vatican’s reported negotiations, about which John might have some more to say later, with the Saudi government over the unthinkable, or the hitherto unthinkable, namely the building of a Catholic church in Saudi Arabia.

* * *

On the pope and the church in the United States and on American society and culture, very briefly. As you read the works of Joseph Ratzinger, particularly in the last 10 to 15 years as he has become more and more concerned with the corrosive impacts of an aggressive secularism in Europe, you have to be struck by the fact that he comes on several occasions in his writing to the point that it was in the United States that the problem of church and state was first resolved. And when he says problem of church and state, he doesn’t simply mean institutional relationships, questions of establishment and non-establishment, legal relationships; he means more broadly the problem of religion and modernity.

George Weigel The Pope comes to America

Hovey on Mark

Craig Hovey To Share in the Body: A Theology of Martyrdom for Today’s Church

“Craig Hovey challenges Christians to be worth persecuting, but he does so without romanticizing suffering or the church. Every church is called to be a martyr-church, not to glorify death, but to declare that death means nothing in the light of what God has done in Christ. In taut prose, Hovey unpacks the logic of Mark’s Gospel and helps the church discern what God is doing in history, both in Mark’s day and in our own. This book is lean, penetrating, and wise. Every page rewards the reader with fresh insight.”

William T. Cavanaugh, associate professor of theology, University of St. Thomas

“Truly an extraordinary book. Some will not be convinced by all of Hovey’s exegetical or systematic theses. But before worrying about such things, readers should simply delight in the sudden insights and revelatory turns of thought that appear on every page.”

Robert Jenson, professor emeritus of religion, St. Olaf College

The blurbs are at Brazos

‘Abortion and religious-related content’

Not quite as bold as ‘The man who sued God’, but it is manifestly a David and Goliath battle which is to be admired, for the outcome has considerable implications for Christians in the areas of equality and freedom of expression.

The Christian Institute simply wanted to pay Google so that when the word ‘abortion’ was typed into the search engine, a link to a web page on its views popped up on the right hand side of the screen. It is a perfectly legal transaction, concerned simply with matters of trade in services.

But it transpires that Google does not allow adverts for websites which contain ‘abortion and religious-related content’, and so it has blocked this pro-life advertisement for the Institute’s website – christian.org.uk – because it is a ‘religious’ site. Apparently ‘religion is not “factual” on abortion’.

Setting aside that Google now presumes to judge on epistemological matters (are all its links filtered and censored for ‘factual’ accuracy?), it is curious indeed that it is only when abortion is presented via a religious site that the material is banned: Google permits abortion-related advertisements from the secularists, atheists, irreligious, non-religious and the mentally depraved (if some of these terms are not mutually inclusive). Needless to say, the perspectives of these are overwhelmingly ‘pro-choice’, and all must be considered by Google to be ‘factual’.

Cranmer Christians who sued Google

Fulcrum

Bishop Tom Wright and Andrew Goddard spoke at today’s Fulcrum conference

The debates we face in the Anglican Communion resonate closely with similar debates in the larger worldwide community, within western society and our own nation.

and

‘Mission-shaped church’ doesn’t mean you can reduce ecclesiology to functional categories. Ephesians offers a deep ecclesial ontology which is, to be frank, what we’re going to need in the next generation. I suspect, actually, that this is the main reason why much liberal Protestantism has rejected the Pauline authorship of Ephesians, and why much conservative Protestantism, while accepting Pauline authorship for quite other reasons, has done its best to avoid the head-on challenge of its super-high ecclesiology, preferring to do with Ephesians what it does with the gospels, namely, dismember it in search of verses which can provide footnotes to a truncated reading of Romans and Galatians…

Conflict and Covenant in the Bible

Conflict and Covenant in the Communion

Talks promptly posted

Singing psalms

Augustine’s Expositions of the Psalms are a lifetime investment. There are five volumes (translated by Boulding, edited by Ramsey, Fiedrowicz) which might set you back $140. Sell some of the books you bought last year, then with the money you have got left over, buy

Jason Byassee Praise Seeking Understanding: Reading the Psalms With Augustine, of which a fair amount is available at Google Book

and

Brian Brock Singing the Ethos of God: On the Place of Christian Ethics in Scripture of which a certain amount is also available at Google Book

The only name in whose powers the Christian can hope is Christ, and that hope excludes any hope for the outcome of history other than the triumph of that name. the essential point for Christian ethics is that it must serve this church., the community waiting in hope for God’s action. The church must thus remain clear about its true threat, says Augustine: the turning away of God’s face.

An older edition of Augustine Expositions on the Psalms is online

Temple talks

The Temple Church talk series continues. Remember the Archbishop Sharia furore in February? That was one in this series. I hope they can repeat their success.

Coming up

Law and Religion 14 April

Islam in English Law 19 May & 9 July

Law and Politics 7th July

I am also going to these

Wednesday 16th April – Edmund Adamus
The Genesis of Humanae Vitae – Memory & Healing

Wednesday 23rd April – Fr Richard Aladics
Building the Civilisation of Love in a Media-Driven World

at St Patrick’s Soho. See you there.

SST

Off to the Society for the Study of Theology conference, at Durham, with my half-finished short paper ‘The Whole Christ and the High Priest’ which, as usual, attempts to summarise what I have learned from everyone in the last 12 months. I’ll post it when I get back, and those Holy Week pieces too.